• HomeSweet home
  • Writingby David Eagleman
    • LivewiredThe Inside Story of the Ever-Changing Brain
    • The Runaway SpeciesHow Human Creativity Remakes the World
    • Brain and BehaviorA Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective
    • The BrainThe Story of You
    • IncognitoThe Secret Lives of the Brain
    • SUMForty Tales from the Afterlives
    • Wednesday is Indigo BlueDiscovering the Brain of Synesthesia
    • The Safety NetSurviving Pandemics and Other Disasters
    • Other WritingEssays and articles
    • Scientific Publications
  • ResearchDavid's Neuroscience
    • Time perception
    • Synesthesia
    • Neurolaw
    • Deep brain recording
    • Sensory Substitution
    • Antiphospholipid Syndrome
    • Other projects
  • BlogLatest Ideas
  • ScheduleWhere to catch David
  • ContactReach Us

Disinformation and "fake news"

Disinformation and "fake news"

Lately we've heard the concern about the ease with which disinformation spreads -- the problem of fake news. We've heard about self-reflecting social media feeds that become echo chambers.


But all this discussion has led me to wonder about something: is our era meaningfully different from previous eras? The first time I was exposed to newspapers was in my grandparents generation. In every major city there were at least two newspapers: one that aligned with your political views, and the others were the rags you would never deign to pick up. Whether about politics, war, or the economy, the newspapers had diverse angles and non-equivalent coverage for their different audiences. 
And beyond newspapers, we all watched disinformation spread in real life from flesh-and-blood friends who repeated factually-incorrect stories, purposefully or accidentally. 
There is nothing new about living inside an echo chamber. We don't need social media for that to happen. I remember that after one election, my grandmother said, dumbfounded, "I don't know a single person who voted for [the winning candidate]." And she was telling the truth: she didn't have acquaintance with anyone who felt differently than she did. Even though that was over half the nation. 


A lot of people are concerned about the Trump presidency, and in many circles social media continues to take heat for his election. But perhaps the question we need to ask is whether there's something new about the confirmation bias that arises in social media, or whether this results from traditional human behavior. Is fake news an internet issue, or a basic social neuroscience issue? 


It's a cognitive illusion to believe that people in previous generations didn't have the same biases in their story dissemination and fact gathering. So we need to be careful not to get trapped in the same kind of illusion that gave rise to a Trump victory in the first place: the 'Make America Great Again' romanticization of earlier eras.

  • Social sharing:
  • Add to Google Buzz
  • Add to Facebook
  • Add to Delicious
  • Digg this
  • Add to StumbleUpon
  • Add to Technorati
  • Add to Reddit
  • Add to MySpace
  • Like this? Tweet it to your followers!
Tagged under
  • disinformation
  • fake news
  • media
More in this category: « Had a great time at the NYT summit with friend and fellow author Charles Duhigg. Powers of the Subconscious »
back to top

Follow David on Instagram Follow David on Tumblr Follow David on Twitter Follow David on Facebook

From the Blog

  • Kernel's Quest to Enhance Human Intelligence
    Kernel's Quest to Enhance Human Intelligence

    I'm a scientific advisor for Kernel, and I think Bryan Johnson is one of the most future-leaning guys I know.

  • Brain Time
    Brain Time

    The days of thinking of time as a river—evenly flowing, always advancing—are over. Time perception, just like vision, is a construction of the brain.

  • Schwarzenegger on Incognito
    Schwarzenegger on Incognito

    What a wonderful shot of caffeine it was to find my childhood hero lauding my book in the New York Times.

  • Why I am a Possibilian
    Why I am a Possibilian

    Our ignorance of the cosmos is too vast to commit to atheism, and yet we know too much to commit to a particular religion. A third position, agnosticism, is often an uninteresting stance in which a person simply questions whether his traditional religious story is true or not true. I call myself a possibilian. Find out why.

In other news...

New Yorker magazine profile

Read a profile of David in The New Yorker: The Possibilian: What a brush with death taught David Eagleman about the mysteries of time and the brain by Burkhard Bilger.
Eagleman in the New Yorker

Sum #2 book in UK

In September, 2009, Sum became the number 2 book in the United Kingdom on Amazon's bestseller list, only behind Dan Brown's Lost Symbol.

Sum named Book of the Year by New Scientist

Sum was the only book of fiction in New Scientist magazine's selection of Best Books of 2009.

brain paperback UK
Amazon

Barnes and Noble
IndieBound
DVD
Incognito Cover Eagleman
Amazon

Barnes and Noble
IndieBound
SumBestSeller
Amazon

Barnes and Noble
IndieBound
Cover Cytowic Eagleman
Amazon

Barnes and Noble
IndieBound
TheSafetyNetsmall
Amazon
Barnes and Noble
IndieBound
CogNeuroTextbook
Amazon
Barnes and Noble
IndieBound
Runaway Species Hardcover
Amazon
Barnes and Noble
IndieBound
Livewired Canongate sm2
Amazon
Barnes and Noble
IndieBound

 
CSS Valid | XHTML Valid | Top | + | - | reset | RTL | LTR
Copyright © Youretro 2021 All rights reserved. Custom Design by Youjoomla.com
YJSimpleGrid Joomla! Templates Framework official website
Blog